Bucha, Irpin, Mariupol – we have all seen the terrible images from Ukraine. They show the reality of war: fear and horror, death and destruction, atrocities and displacement. This war challenges everyone. It is even changing Switzerland.
Having maintained a restrictive refugee policy for many years, the country is now opening its doors. Tens of thousands of refugees from Ukraine, who arrived laden with troubles but with few belongings, have been admitted into the country, no questions asked. The war is also making Switzerland question itself. How is a small country that calls itself neutral to behave? When does neutral non-involvement turn into indifference?
When the war started, the Federal Council initially decided neutral Switzerland would not impose sanctions on Russia, opting instead to ensure the country could not be used as a platform for circumventing sanctions. It was far from clear what that actually meant in practical terms.
Since then, Switzerland has been on something of a mission. Just a few days later, the country adopted all the EU sanctions, as neutrality could not mean not taking a position, said Ignazio Cassis, the president of the Confederation. Russia responded by placing Switzerland on its list of unfriendly countries. Meanwhile, Russia’s dealings with Switzerland remain extensive and opaque. Some 80 per cent of Russia’s commodity trading goes through Switzerland. Oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin have assets worth up to 200 billion Swiss francs stashed away in Switzerland.
Swiss asset hunters have only located and frozen a fraction of that amount. This has prompted the Helsinki Commission, an independent US government authority, to pull no punches, calling Switzerland a “leading enabler of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin”. Switzerland may well have to conduct a detailed review of its anti-money laundering laws as a result.
But what about those who have no billions but their lives and future to worry about? We met some displaced Ukrainians currently living in a small village near Berne, and asked the question: how is Switzerland treating refugees from Ukraine?
Comments
Comments :
The article entitled A MESSIANIC LONGING FOR HUMAN HAPPINESS, however, was not trivial, notwithstanding the journalist's choice. Apparently, the author, Edmond Fleg, writer of “The Boy Prophet” chosen by Charles Linsmayer, suffered terrible personal loss owing to WWII. For years preceding and during this war, among other perversions, unimaginable atrocities and horrors were committed by Nazis and collaborators as a result of maniacal forces, and Judeophobia. Thus, if Fleg has his “central character” unable to answer “what it means to be Jewish”, and “out of sympathy” repeats a maleficent trope of his girlfriend’s Christian faith, this feature serves to perpetuate a provocative and questionable exercise and recommendation.
Even as the question of Why Switzerland?... more than 700 years later can be successfully demonstrated, so might the question, posed by a confused character in a rather obscure book be more than adequately answered, in its moral and ethical dimensions. It is definitely readily accessible from countless reliable sources- today, as ever.
Ruth Heuberger
No, I find it is cynical. It's well understood that a significant portion of this collection was acquired under duress from Jews who desperately tried to flee from the Nazis. Why would the Zurcher Kunsthaus have anything to do with this ?
The Buehrle Foundation could have long ago provided a museum for this collection if they wanted to.
The Zurcher Kunsthaus extension provided the perfect respectable venue for this 'permanent loan' of a tainted collection. Besides the taxpayer is chipping in CHF 75 mio.
HANS HEUBERGER, Great Barrington MA, USA