Displaying a Nazi symbol or making a Nazi salute in public is not always to commit a crime in Switzerland. A number of parliamentary motions – and the Council of the Swiss Abroad – now want zero tolerance. Initially hesitant, the government is now looking into the matter.
At a rally protesting against anti-Covid measures in September 2021, a demonstrator made a Nazi salute – right in the middle of Berne’s old town. The public prosecutor’s office consequently issued the demonstrator with a penalty order for improper behaviour. However, the man successfully contested the notice. There was no legal basis for a conviction, a local court ruled. A neo-Nazi who made the same salute in 2010 on Rütli Meadow in the canton of Uri also ended up being acquitted. The Federal Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the man had been expressing his own convictions among like-minded people, and that this was not a criminal offence. Had he been making the salute to spread Nazi ideology on the other hand, he would have been punished under Swiss anti-racism laws.
These examples show that Switzerland has a certain tolerance threshold when it comes to making Nazi symbols and gestures. Nazi salutes, swastikas, etc. are only banned when used for propaganda purposes. Political efforts to scrap this distinction have been ongoing since 2003. Majorities in the Federal Council and parliament have so far judged freedom of expression to be more important, but the perception seems to be shifting now. Three motions on the issue have been submitted in parliament – one from the centre right and two from the left.
Aargau National Councillor for The Centre, Marianne Binder, set the ball rolling in winter. Binder wants a complete ban on Nazi gestures, flags and symbols, both in the real world and online. Explaining her motion, she said, “Anti-Semitic incidents have increased and took on a new dimension during the pandemic.” The Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities (SIG) and the Foundation against Racism and Anti-Semitism (GRA) confirm this. According to their Report on Anti-Semitism, 2021 saw a proliferation of anti-Semitic incidents in Switzerland. There were 806 reports of online anti-Semitic content including anti-Semitic conspiracy theories – a more than 60 per cent increase on the previous year.
“Nazi symbols and salutes are unambiguous. They certainly do not come under freedom of expression.”
National Councillor for The Centre
There were 53 real-world anti-Semitic incidents, which included verbal abuse, public statements and offensive graffiti on synagogues. Anti-vaccine protesters wore stars of David inscribed with the word “unvaccinated”. And in a Zurich suburb, they graffitied “Impfen [vaccination] macht frei” – a play on words on the infamous gate at Auschwitz – next to a swastika. People argue that the protesters need not have had anti-Semitic motives, says Binder. “You can plead stupidity, but how blind to history can you be?” she asks, adding that it constitutes an intolerable trivialisation of the Holocaust.
Binder deliberately restricted the motion to focusing on symbols and gestures related to Nazism and the Holocaust, whereas previous motions had targeted symbols and gestures encouraging racism and violence in general. Otherwise, it would have been difficult to list every single possible infraction. But Nazi symbols and salutes are unambiguous. “They certainly do not come under freedom of expression.” SP National Councillor for Aargau, Gabriela Suter, and SP National Councillor for Zurich, Angelo Barrile, doubled down with similar parliamentary initiatives. The SIG endorsed the motions in January 2022, the first time it has explicitly put its weight behind initiatives of this type. Far-right extremists at protest rallies and concerts were specifically taking advantage of Switzerland’s legal loophole, it said. “This is particularly hurtful and bewildering for the minorities affected.”
“After debating the issue for almost 20 years, Switzerland now needs to act and follow the examples of other countries.”
Member of the Council of the Swiss Abroad
The Council of the Swiss Abroad, which represents the interests of the “Fifth Switzerland” via-à-vis the authorities and the general public, also expressed support in March for criminalising all use of Nazi symbols and gestures in public. On behalf of the delegation from Israel, Ralph Steigrad noted that Switzerland had been debating the issue for almost 20 years: “It now needs to act and follow the examples of other countries.” This did not mean stopping symbols from being shown in teaching material for purely educational purposes, he stressed. However, the Federal Council initially wanted to leave things as they were for the time being and rejected Marianne Binder’s motion. Even though Nazi symbols and salutes were “shocking”, they had to be tolerated as an exercise of freedom of expression, it wrote in reply. Educating people was better than enacting a ban.
Legal and extremism experts are divided over the issue. Some say that far-right extremists might even feel vindicated if criminal proceedings were brought against them, and that a sweeping ban potentially moves us to a kind of penal law focused on punishing offenders’ attitudes or belief systems instead of the act itself. Others argue that Nazi symbols pose a threat to peaceful, democratic society and are unacceptable in any country governed by the rule of law. And lo and behold, the Federal Council appears to have overcome its initial hesitancy amid reports that Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter is looking into the matter after all. The FDP Federal Councillor said her ministry would now see what legal options are available.
“The Federal Council is well aware of the increase in anti-Semitic incidents in Switzerland.”
Justice Minister
Keller-Sutter also wrote a reply to the OSA (via which the Council of the Swiss Abroad had expressed its concerns to the Federal Council), assuring it that the government was well aware of the increase in anti-Semitic incidents in Switzerland. By all means you can prevent anti-Semitism and ban Nazi symbols at the same time, says Binder. It is necessary to do both. Building a Holocaust memorial (see box) while continuing to allow Nazi symbols and salutes defeats the object. Binder’s motion has not yet been dealt with in the Federal Council.
Official Holocaust memorial to be built
Switzerland is set to have its own official memorial commemorating the victims of National Socialism. During the spring session of parliament, both chambers unanimously approved motions, which had been submitted by Alfred Heer (SVP/canton of Zurich) in the National Council and Daniel Jositsch (SP/canton of Zurich) in the Council of States. We need to ensure that the terrible crimes of the Nazis remain rooted in our collective memory, said Jositsch. The memorial grew out of an initiative by five organisations, including the Organisation of the Swiss Abroad (OSA). Its purpose is to remember Swiss whom the Nazi regime persecuted, disenfranchised and murdered for being Jews or political opponents. At least 450 people with Swiss citizenship ended up in Hitler’s concentration camps. If you also include people who were born or lived in Switzerland, then you have well over 1,000 victims with Swiss connections. The monument will also honour the men and women who resisted the Nazis or offered protection or help to those who were persecuted. And it will be dedicated to people whom the Swiss authorities refused to rescue. Now parliament has given the green light, the Federal Council must flesh out the project. It is still unclear where the memorial site will be. The organisations that submitted the project to the federal government last year have proposed the city of Berne. In addition to an aesthetic public memorial, the aim is to include an additional space for exhibitions and events, and set up a virtual interface with other existing, private memorials.
Comments
Comments :
Aber gleichzeitig unterstûtzen wir die Neo-Nazis, die ganz öffentlich mit tätowierten Hakenkreuzen herumlaufen und den Nazi-Kollaborateur Stepan Bandera bewundern ...
Si on limite le sujet aux juifs, on ne comprends pas que ce n'est qu'un des groupes sociaux désignés par certains extrémistes comme responsables des problèmes d'un supposé "peuple nationale". Au lieu de juifs on peut écrire étrangers, immigrants, LGTB, gitans, pauvres,..... quiconque ne répond pas à LEUR définition de la pureté du sang national. Je lis les commentaires de plusieurs personnes qui se qualifient de libérales, y de défenseuse de la liberté d'expression. Elles feront aussi partie des exclus si ces extrémistes obtiennent plus de pouvoir. Il faut arrêter d'être ingénu et tolérant avec ceux qui désignent des collectifs comme ennemis et promeuvent l'élimination du "différent".
Als Jude ist es mir wichtig, immer wieder zu betonen, dass die Nazisymbole nicht nur Ausdruck des Antisemitismus sind, nicht nur uns Juden betreffen, sondern Ausdruck einer systematischen Entmenschlichung allumfassend gegen jedermann sind. Um so mehr wundert es mich, dass die Zivilisation überhaupt ein angeblich juristisches Problem damit hat, diese Symbolik grundsätzlich als Verbrechen zu ahnden, ganz einerlei in welchem Zusammenhang.
Obwohl ich im Prinzip einverstanden bin, dass ein Holocaust nie mehr statt finden soll: Das Einschränken der freien Sprache soll auch nie zum Opfer fallen. Vor was habt Ihr Angst? Es ist immer mehr die Regel, dass die linke Seite nur toleriert, was unter ihrer Sicht akzeptierbar ist.
Ich hab nicht das geringste Problem mit freier Meinungsäusserung. Aber ich habe ein Problem damit, dass der Redner, der Darsteller, keine persönliche Verantwortung für sein zum Ausdruck Gebrachtes übernehmen muss. WARUM? Mobbing wird geahndet aber Antisemitismus nicht - wo bleibt da die juristische Logik?
Bitte keinen Geschichts-Revisionismus! Wir sprechen über Nazi-Symbole und der Missbrauch des David Sternes. Wir debattieren über die Geschehnisse in Europa im Kontext mit der Pandemie und über den Antisemitismus in Europa. Die Schweiz hat wenig Zeit gebraucht, um die Kommunistische Partei zu verbieten, braucht aber Jahrzehnte, um das Unrecht während der Nazi-Zeit aufzuarbeiten.Dies ist nicht eine juristische "Erbsenzählerei", sondern eine politische und moralische Verpflichtung.
Genau aus diesem Grund habe ich die Schweiz verlassen. Nicht nur wurde mein Restaurant mit Nazisymbolen besprayt, gewisse Personen sagten mir auch,dass sie es bevorzugen, bei einem Nichtjuden ihr Bier zu trinken. Das sind nur Kleinigkeiten,andere Aussagen will ich hier nicht wiederholen. Arme Schweiz,viele Leute haben aus der Vergangenheit nichts gelernt.
Wenn man die Geschichte genau betrachtet, kann man feststellen, dass genau der Kommunismus mindestens 94 Millionen Menschen umgebracht hat...
Verbietet endlich mal den Linksradikalismus!
Kommunismus, Kapitalismus - beide sind sie eine Philosophie menschlicher Gesellschaftsform des Miteinander je nach individueller Wahl, mal benutzt zum Guten, mal missbraucht zum Schlechten. ANTISEMITISMUS gehört nicht in diese Kategorie, weil er bestimmt, dass ein Jude ausschliesslich schlecht ist, ganz einerlei welcher gesellschaftlichen Zugehörigkeit auch immer er sei, einerlei was er tut oder nicht tut, schlecht aus erblichem Grunde, hat nicht die Wahl so oder anders zu sein, hat nicht mal die Wahl gut oder schlecht zu sein, sondern IST einfach Natur gegeben schlecht - Rassismus eben.
Good
There is a very line between expressing your own conviction and a criminal offence in this matter. For how much longer do we have to " EDUCATE " people about what has been done to the Jewish population during the 2. World War. SHAME to the majority in the Federal Council an the Parliament and thank you Marianne Binder. There is just no place anywhere for Anti-Semitism.
Es ist für mich unverständlich, dass es auch heute noch "Unverbesserliche" gibt, die aus der Vergangenheit nichts gelernt haben. Alle Symbolik und Grüße aus der Nazi-Zeit sollten wirklich unter Strafe gestellt werden. Wo es hinführen kann, sieht man u.a. nicht nur in den USA, sondern leider mittlerweile ja auch immer öfter in Europa.
Ich schlage vor, als Zeichen echter Absicht, dem dem Kindlifrässer-Brunnen in Bern endlich den Judenhut abzusetzen. Danke!
Habe mir den Kindlifrässerbrunnen genau angeschaut. Trägt der Unhold tatsächlich eine "jüdische" Kopfbedeckung?
Ja, das ist ein Hutcharakter, der für die Juden damals Pflicht war, als Erkennungsmerkmal.
Je suis allemande de naissance et je trouve que l'on devrait poursuivre ces criminels - 1 fois nous a suffit!!!!
Oui, cela est vrai mieux vaut tard que jamais, mais QUELLE LENTEUR. Eh Suisse, réveille-toi ! Regarde autour de toi. Le monde avance et tu es encore à réfléchir à peut-être un jour éventuellement faire une loi qui condamnerait de promouvoir l'inacceptable, c'est à dire la haine de l'Autre.
Un peu de courage s'il vous plaît !
Besser mit Jahrzehnten Verspätung als gar nicht. Meine Hochtung für Marianne Binder!